If the murderous bloodshed of September 11, 2001 had taken destination even though Barack Obama have been President of the United States, and his reaction and subsequent retaliation had followed exactly the path that George W. Bush had taken, undoubtedly he would not only have been branded the best wartime commander in the heritage of all humankind by the mainstream media, but he would have garnered my help without having a scintilla of equivocation. If, however, underneath the very same scenario, with the rubble in reduce Manhattan nevertheless smoldering, President Obama would have known as for an rapid summit of Muslim leaders (and a process power or two to boot) to figure out not only why such a tragedy occurred, but exactly what the United States would require to change in its foreign plan to keep the peace, I would have mentioned adamantly and ferociously that I did not assistance the President. For this reason, employing this instance, I submit that to claim aid for the President without having supporting his policies is accurately the similar as expressing that a person supports the troops not having supporting the war. It is a nonsensical statement. It is not potential. It is rather prevalent, for instance, to hear an individual say they assistance the war effort in Afghanistan but not in Iraq. Although that is not my situation, 1 is definitely entitled to sense that way. If that is, certainly, the case, then it is intellectually dishonest to say that somebody who takes that placement supports the troops in Iraq..